THE ADVANTAGES AND LIMITS OF A “FULL-SPECTRUM” APPROACH TO COMMUNICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT (C4D)

Karen Greiner

Abstract


This Viewpoint essay is dedicated to communication practitioners across the globe, and to my former doctoral-student self, who once-upon-a-time sought clear definitions and descriptions of communication for development (C4D), but found clarity only after consulting multiple resources. I never found a short summary resource, which is what I have endeavored to provide here. I present in this essay a “full-spectrum” approach to communication for development in order to synthesise, complement, and in some cases challenge what has been documented elsewhere. I propose additional analytical categories and concepts to illustrate the benefits and challenges of a full-spectrum approach. My aim is to invite reflection and discussion about what it means to go broader and deeper when we communicate to inspire action and promote positive social change in communities. It is my hope that the concepts and domains presented as the “full-spectrum” approach might be useful (and used), by the designers, implementers and researchers of communication interventions.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513 – 531.

Grady, C., & Chapman, R. (2015). New media in Burkina Faso, Chad and Niger: Survey results and analysis. Retrieved from https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00MMXS.pdf.

Greiner, K. (2017). Ground-Air-Cloud: Designing for maximum reach and dialogue in communication for development/social change, Medium.com https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/b7f2dc_fddff6c9bd61476a8bc9fac125d3e80f.pdf.

Heywood, M. (2009). South Africa’s treatment action campaign: Combining law and social mobilization to realize the right to health. Journal of Human Rights Practice 1(1), 14–36.

McCall, E. (2011). Communication for development: Strengthening the effectiveness of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/cbsc/files/Inter-agency_C4D_Book_2011.pdf.

Mefalopulos, P. (2008). Development Communication Sourcebook: Broadening the Boundaries of Communication. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Obregon, R., & Waisbord, S. (2010). The complexity of social mobilization in health communication: top-down and bottom-up experiences in polio eradication. Journal of Health Communication, 15(1), 25-47. doi: 10.1080/10810731003695367.

Singhal, A. (2010). Riding high on Taru fever: Entertainment-education broadcasts, ground mobilization, and service delivery in rural India. The Hague: Oxfam Novib.

Singhal, A., Sharma, D., Papa, M. J., & Witte, K. (2003). Air cover and ground mobilization: Integrating entertainment-education broadcasts with community listening and service delivery in India. In Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice (pp. 351-374). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

The Rome Consensus. (2006). World Congress on communication for development: Lessons, challenges, and the way forward. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.